It surprised me to still hear Phoenicians say, "We're becoming another Los Angeles" or "We don't want to become another LA." This vox local yokel reminds me that people in Phoenix don't get out much. To be fair, I used to think the same thing. That was until I was 10 years old, when my mother took me to the City of Angels on Southern Pacific's Sunset Limited, and we arrived at LA Union Passenger Terminal (above). I had never seen a building so grand — and the rest of the city was just as stunning. This was the first big city I'd been in, and it was nothing like little Phoenix.
I judge a city by its trains. Union Station has been restored to its grandeur and actually hosts more arrivals and departures than when it opened in 1939. In addition to Amtrak intercity trains to Chicago, Houston, New Orleans, and Seattle, it is the hub for LA Metrolink's six commuter rail lines, plus three subway and light-rail lines. All around it, downtown LA is undergoing a stunning renaissance — not only with new buildings such as the 1,099-foot Wilshire Grand but rehabbing its stock of majestic architecture from the early 20th century. It was never true that Los Angeles "didn't have a downtown." It had several, including Century City, Westwood, Hollywood, and downtown proper. All of them leave Phoenix looking like Hooterville by comparison. LA made a terrible mistake in tearing out the extensive Pacific Electric Railway, but it's making amends fast.
Phoenix becoming another Los Angeles? It should be so lucky. LA is one of America's three world cities, as defined by sociologist Janet Abu-Lughod's famous book of the same name. The influential Globalization and World Cities Network ranks it as an Alpha city, the third highest level of global power (only New York is Alpha ++ among North American cities). Phoenix is gamma, the ninth category. Phoenix peers Denver, Seattle, and San Diego rank Beta-minus. The LA metropolitan area's gross domestic product totaled more than $931 billion in 2017, second only to New York City in inflation-adjusted dollars. Phoenix, although the nation's fifth-largest city and 13th most populous metro ranked 17th, at $220 billion (again, behind peer metros). If LA were a nation, its output would rival Australia.
To become another LA, Phoenix would need more than freeways and traffic congestion. It would have world-class universities such as the University of Southern California, UCLA, Caltech, and Pepperdine, along with elite institutions such as Occidental College, Loyola Marymount University, UC Irvine, Claremont McKenna College, and Chapman University. Add in the Cal State campuses at Los Angeles, Northridge, Dominguez Hills, Long Beach, Fullerton, and Pamona, plus many (real) private institutions and LA has a huge engine of higher learning, top talent, and innovation.
Being another LA would mean world connections, from LAX, the second busiest airport in the nation with direct flights to dozens of international destinations, to the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach, among the busiest in the world. The lack of direct service from Sky Harbor to Asia is a huge impediment to Phoenix in the Asian Century. The ports directly support more than 160,000 jobs in LA and Long Beach and several times that number in the region. They are the foundation that supported California's $172 billion in merchandise exports last year (compared with Arizona's $21 billion). LA has a Chinatown, Koreatown, Little Tokyo, Little Armenia, Filipinotown, Little Ethiopia, along with numerous historic barrios. Although it lost its major banks, LA remains a center of international finance (Phoenix has barely any, except for some real-estate speculation). Los Angeles hosted the summer Olympics in 1932 and 1984, and is set to hold the 2028 games.
Another LA? To get there, Phoenix would need such top cultural assets as the Los Angeles County Museum of Art, the Getty, Huntington Library, the Beaux Arts Natural History Museum in Exposition Park, the Broad, the Hammer, and Griffith Observatory, among other treasures. Gallery Row would never be mistaken for Roosevelt Row. The LA Philharmonic is one of the finest orchestras in the world. The city's intellectual life could be reflected in a Phoenix Review of Books, but that doesn't exist. LA has one. Also, Phoenix would need to be headquarters of the entertainment industry. In addition to their worldwide influence, the creative sectors make a massive footprint in the economy. LA is the largest manufacturing center west of Chicago.
Los Angeles does offer an interesting thought exercise that longtime readers may remember. It went from a population of 102,000 in the city in 1900 to 1.2 million in 1930. In that time, it set in place many of the assets that are still its backbone, including the universities, manmade port (surpassing San Francisco) and Hollywood. Phoenix had 107,000 in 1950 and took half a century to reach 1.3 million. Yet the Phoenix of 2000 has no USC, no UCLA, no international powerhouse economy, cherished if financially shaky cultural assets yes, but nothing appropriate to its size. It shares with LA lots of freeways and sprawl, plus a large Hispanic underclass — but one that lacks the political power of its counterpart on the coast.
Phoenix remains a back-office of LA, where the low-wage jobs are dependent on the high-wage, high-skilled work of California. It's not another LA, and stands no chance of even matching its peers in well-being and competitiveness. The local-yokel apologists don't even want that, because...sunshine! championship golf! and an elite getting rich from the extraction industry of profaning the Sonoran Desert with tract houses. California is a solid blue state, allowing for progressive advances. Arizona's Kookocracy won't even allow local control of blueish Phoenix and Tempe. Another San Bernardino County, maybe. But no passenger trains to downtown Los Angeles.
I remember well the refrain from the Republic-"We don't want to become another Los Angeles" when fighting against I-10.So we became Los Angeles without freeways and more traffic than we knew what to do with.My friends like to make fun of the land of "fruits and nuts",but I don't see anything wrong with L.A.with their enlightened race relations and move towards mass transit.If that is what's wrong with this country,I'll take it.
Posted by: Mike Doughty | February 22, 2018 at 05:52 PM
Metro Phoenix is a Mecca for small town heartlanders who think they moved to the big city. They hold tight to the various myths and falsehoods described in this excellent Rogue article. They exemplify the present era Republican: a rube.
Posted by: drifter | February 22, 2018 at 06:44 PM
I am a Chapman University alum who eventually moved back to Arizona. The only part of this article I disagree with is that Chapman is considered an elite institution. It's not.
Any school that would employ Joel Kotkin is not to be taken seriously. Hell, the school is an afterthought in Southern California and is better known as the school rich Orange County kids attend when they can't get into USC, UCLA or UC Irvine.
Posted by: Ryan | February 22, 2018 at 08:43 PM
Look, what makes Phoenix look so large is the massive number of retired and near retired folks- if we had a more normal distribution of ages we would have about 2 million people in the area and would not support the massive numbers of healthcare and service jobs beyond a mid sized tourist trade. In short, Sacramento sized city- or a smaller Salt Lake area.
As for the parochial politics, well, charter schools have eroded the desire to pay for better public schools (as intended), and as for the rest of state government, undead zombie status is the true state of it. ADOT doing a poor job building roads, and nothing else matters much.
Quite frankly, the entire place has the stench of old folks awaiting their slice of paradise. No real desire beyond cheap food, cheap booze, cheap taxes and cheap healthcare.
So, in reality, without big gains from high end employment, we just sit and stagnate. And that is just about the entire bit of reality...as I said ten bloody years ago.
No dynamic growth industries, so no dynamic growth, just one more retirement boomer blast, before they hit their expiration date.
Might as well start ripping out golf courses before the next recession hits and turns them brown.
The reality is we have no national industrial policy, we have no real educational policy, we have no real national medical policy for working age America, so we run an insurance company combined with the biggest military in the world, while sucking at improving America.
And the young folks think the boomers have utterly failed, and I gotta agree- and they want to try more socialism.
So, those psychopathic libertarian rich have their moment of nirvana before the end comes when they lose the majority vote- and payback is going to be a real beeeyatch.
In short, most of the western governments are crazy in terms of goals and logic, yet nobody has sufficient power to stick to what is realistically achievable. Except Putin, who is looking like the most sane world leader, and oddly enough will be one of the few that might look good in the history books.
The Gods must be Crazy...because we are made in their image!!!
Posted by: Concern Troll | February 22, 2018 at 09:37 PM
As one who is in LA right now for a few days, I say yay to Phoenix becoming in another one (an impossible task), despite the traffic. What an amazing city that makes Phoenix look pretty bad by any measure except affordability. Anything interesting in Phoenix is a tiny sliver of what greater LA has to offer. They even seem to use turn signals here more often.
Posted by: Artur | February 22, 2018 at 11:05 PM
I've worked in LA for the past 8 years, both at the Federal Aviation Administration and as a pilot for a major airline. I have commuted from Phoenix for all 8 years. I'd estimate 50-60% of our LAX pilot group commutes from outside California, the majority coming from Phoenix. The pilot I flew with today quizzed me about the lifestyle in Phoenix. He's planning to move from SoCal to either Tucson or Phoenix.
I've considered moving to LA in the past so I wouldn't commute weekly. Between the astronomically high costs of housing, spotty primary school quality, atrocious roadway congestion, high rates of taxation and lack of affordable championship golf I've demurred.
LA has a lot to offer, but (subjectively) the quality of life Phoenix offers is unmatched by LA.
Posted by: Joe | February 22, 2018 at 11:26 PM
I was 12 years old when I first saw LA in 1960. It blew me away. The downtown was unlike any I had ever seen before: busy and quite urban. The next time I saw it in the early '70s, something strange had happened. The city was still there but the people were gone. For roughly three decades LA's downtown was like this, a kind of Potemkin village that looked okay on postcards but was otherwise inert. Now, the downtown is roaring back and may actually be LA's heartbeat. As revivals go, this one rivals Lazarus.
Joel Kotkin used to opine about polycentric cites like LA that just because there wasn't a strong downtown didn't mean that LA should want one. But you can actually get a sense of excitement with the one that is emerging. The old ceremonial model betrayed a feeling that LA wasn't truly serious. Now it looks like a big city with a big skyline and a big ego.
The comparisons between LA and Phoenix are appropriate because both are sprawling car towns with a kind of fun-in-the-sun vibe. LA has the better climate, geography, and economy. Phoenix has cheaper housing and a sense of manageability. I love LA but would I want to live there? No. It's too vast, too costly, and congested. You definitely need a car although the transit is much, much better than it used to be. Overall, if you're young and on the make, LA is the place to be.
Still, Phoenix is nice for what it is. It came of age in the wrong era, however. There's no different set of facts that could ever change its fate as a second-rate city. Even if we were to somehow manifest the right civic stewards, politics, and consciousness, Phoenix would still have weak bones and low energy. That's okay. One LA is enough and it's not that far away.
Posted by: soleri | February 23, 2018 at 02:49 AM
Sadly one cannot board the Sante Fe from downtown Phoenix to LA.
Posted by: Cal Lash | February 23, 2018 at 09:34 AM
Growth is the ideology of cancer cells?
LA, NY, Seattle, are humongous cancer tumors. Arizona is more like skin cancer sprawl. Both are eventually doomed. Hence I'll stay in places like the Lechugua deserts where one can see for miles without man made edifices interrupting the horizon and where the coyotes still howl.
Posted by: Cal Lash | February 23, 2018 at 09:43 AM
If you want to preserve wide open spaces, live in the heart of a city. Seattle also benefits from Washington state's growth boundaries.
Posted by: Rogue Columnist | February 23, 2018 at 11:16 AM
Yes, Phoenix would do well to strive for LA’s university system and cultural assets. But let’s not forget about: the insane traffic; the insane housing market; legitimately dangerous neighborhoods; the LAPD; the ironic bad-mouthing of all things LA; the economic reliance on an awful studio system; earthquakes; a population churn that makes Phoenix seem stable; relatively high business taxes; Lakers and Dodgers fans.
Posted by: Jacob Hughes | February 23, 2018 at 11:17 AM
Tap water in Phoenix tastes awful. In fact, water resources or lack thereof in both L.A. and Phoenix will define their future and perhaps stifle growth.
Posted by: Dude | February 23, 2018 at 11:37 AM
I'm for preserving great expanses of open wide spaces so i can have a quiet place to throw down. So U all keep crouched and crunched down in claustrophobic holes of scurrying rats.
Lumholtz, " will never rest easily in the civilization that is raking the globe with machines and orderly practices." Bowden in Mezcal.
Posted by: Cal Lash | February 23, 2018 at 11:46 AM
Up with the Luddites!
Posted by: terry dudas | February 23, 2018 at 03:39 PM
Down with the Hittites?
Posted by: Cal Lash | February 23, 2018 at 05:03 PM
So why are my friends in LA considering moving because it has become unlivable? That won't show up in any statistics but it's fairly important. Phoenix is only verging on that status.
Posted by: El Kabong | February 23, 2018 at 05:53 PM
Impressively off-topic, El. I have friends considering moving from Phoenix because it's become unlivable. This column is about the surprising (?) Phoenix ignorance about LA.
Posted by: Rogue Columnist | February 23, 2018 at 06:49 PM
Okay. You're certainly right about the ignorance.
Posted by: El Kabong | February 23, 2018 at 07:16 PM
And then there's the reality of grinding and expansive homelessness in both places, unmanageable in LA, still pretty hidden in Phoenix.
Take another look at the one and outs of growth boundaries as a management tool.
See my post "Size Matters" comparing Portland and Phoenix.
skayoliver
Posted by: Stephanie Oliver | February 24, 2018 at 07:29 AM
The unbridled growth in Phoenix is irrational. We don't create organic communities or neighborhoods. The only advantage to living in Phoenix is you can still find a parking place. There's not much that tempts me to go out. There is a creative energy in LA that is palpable and that you feel as soon as you arrive. Phoenix is a great parasitic organism that contributes little but cheap houses and has been that way since the 1950's.
Posted by: emmy brighton | February 24, 2018 at 08:28 AM
Phoenix has very little cosmopolitanism, diversity, or creativity. It takes these three components for vibrant, urban energy.
Phoenix decided a long time ago to be predictable, staid, homogenous, and conformist. This desire for simple and easy is what condemns it to being boring, uninspiring, and dull. Its chance to be vibrant, appealing, and trendy has come and gone.
Posted by: Bradley Dranka | February 24, 2018 at 01:00 PM
I've only ever visited there, but I've always liked L.A. It has great natural assets like the weather and coast and embodied the optimistic spirit of America in the last century. You just have to try to forget about the possibility of catastrophic earthquakes, wildfires and the fact that, like Phoenix, it is a gigantic city spread over a desert that can't be supported by regional water.
What I really don't understand about L.A. is how people afford to live there. I don't understand the economics of having to spend 500k-1 million to buy a decent house in a decent neighborhood. That's a serious question. How do average people deal with that dilemma?
Posted by: Jon7190 | February 25, 2018 at 09:19 PM
Restructure the Arizona University System to provide greater accessibility, affordability, and accountability to a public university education for many more Arizonans:
http://PSUandAzTech.blogspot.com
Posted by: Sanjeev Ramchandra | February 25, 2018 at 10:24 PM
Status report: I visited the Queen Creek Olive Mill on Sunday. The conversion of the irrigated cropland in Queen Creek into tract homes is well underway, 40 miles out from downtown Phoenix. And more building has taken place and is continuing another 10 miles farther out, in San Tan Valley. Friends of mine report that the tract-house wavefront is now hitting Florence. Is Safford safe?
On weekdays there must be massive traffic jams as people commute from these places to jobs in Mesa, Tempe, Chandler, and Phoenix, since the developers do not build highway projects to accommodate the cars they bring in. Since the Town of Queen Creek hasn't done much either, impact fees are apparently not nearly enough. They've managed a railroad underpass and a little widening. That's it.
The protocol: Privatize profits from building houses; socialize costs of infrastructure to support them.
The Arizona Model of Growth.
Posted by: Joe Schallan | February 28, 2018 at 02:03 PM
Phoenix lacks even one business block like this (although it once had them).
https://www.facebook.com/cantersdeli/photos/a.385240871505301.102770.127121980650526/385240878171967/?type=3
Posted by: Rogue Columnist | March 01, 2018 at 10:12 AM
You mentioned the two Olympics, but something else that makes LA special is that it is a championship sports market. In the last 10 years LA teams have played in two NBA finals, two Stanley Cup finals, two World Series, and one Superbowl. The haul, two Stanley Cups and two NBA titles, literally quadruple the number of Phoenix championships in the last 42 years. And going back a little further, the Angels won a World series in 2002, and the Ducks won the Cup in '07, so six titles in the 19 years since the last Phoenix championship.
Posted by: John D'Anna | September 24, 2020 at 04:39 PM
Good assessment. I've been here eight years now. The LAT still puts out a product worth buying, the Metro is down in ridership but gets you sorta where you're going, the museums aren't deeply stocked, downtown is still patchy but remains the city's best neighborhood, city council is a mess, the mayor is well-liked. Thanks for the call-out to LARB! And while Chapman has a solid but mixed profile, it's unfair to hang everything on Kotkin who comes around maybe once every ten weeks to pick up his mail. We have more than 500 FT faculty members who aren't him.
Posted by: Tom Zoellner | September 24, 2020 at 05:49 PM
"I judge a city by its trains".
If that's the criteria, Phoenix certainly doesn't qualify. Everyone has different criteria. In work and play, I almost always require the flexibility and carrying capacity of a car/truck. Everybody I know is the same.
Posted by: Jerome R Petruk | November 19, 2021 at 06:00 PM